TY  - BOOK
AU  - Bejan,Teresa M.
TI  - Mere civility: disagreement and the limits of toleration 
SN  - 9780674972728
AV  - BJ1533 .M474 2017
PY  - 2017///
CY  - Cambridge, Mass.
PB  - Harvard University Press
KW  - Courtesy
KW  - Political aspects
KW  - Toleration
KW  - Discussion
KW  - Freedom of speech
KW  - Forums (Discussion and debate)
KW  - History
KW  - POLITICAL SCIENCE
KW  - PHILOSOPHY
KW  - Electronic Books
N1  - Based on the author's thesis (Ph. D.--Yale University, 2013); 2; Introduction: Wars of words --; "Persecution of the tongue" --; "Silver alarums": Roger Williams's "meer" civility --; "If it be without contention": Hobbes and civil silence --; "A bond of mutual charity": Locke and the quest for concord --; Conclusion: The virtue of mere civility --; Epilogue: Free speech fundamentalism; 2; b
N2  - Civility is often treated as an essential virtue in liberal democracies that promise to protect diversity as well as active disagreement in the public sphere. Yet the fear that our tolerant society faces a crisis of incivility is gaining ground. Politicians and public intellectuals call for "more civility" as the solution--but is civility really a virtue? Or is it something more sinister--a covert demand for conformity that silences dissent? Mere Civility sheds light on this tension in contemporary political theory and practice by examining similar appeals to civility in early modern debates about religious toleration. In seventeenth-century England, figures as different as Roger Williams, Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke could agree that some restraint on the wars of words and "persecution of the tongue" between sectarians would be required; and yet, they recognized that the prosecution of incivility was often difficult to distinguish from persecution.--
UR  - https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2024359&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518
ER  -