Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Professional ethics at the international bar /Arman Sarvarian.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Publication details: Oxford : Oxford university press, (c)2013.; Oxford Oxford University Press, (c)2013.Edition: First editionDescription: 1 online resource (xxvi, 306 pages)Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9780191668821
Subject(s): Genre/Form: LOC classification:
  • K123 .P764 2013
Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
Contents:
1.1.The Function of the International Judicial System -- 1.2.The Role of Professional Advocacy in International Litigation -- 1.2.1.Professionalism -- 1.2.2.Professionalization -- 1.2.3.Fundamental Ethical Duties -- 1.3.Arguments for the Professionalization of Advocacy -- 1.3.1.Solving Practical Problems -- 1.3.2.Enhancing the Image of International Courts -- 1.3.3.Stages of Professionalization -- 1.4.Arguments against the Professionalization of Advocacy -- 1.4.1.Common Ethical Standards are Impossible -- 1.4.2.Enforcement is Impracticable -- 1.4.3.Professionalization would Infringe Sovereignty -- 1.5.Conclusions -- 2.The Historical Development of National Ethical Traditions -- 2.1.European Traditions -- 2.1.1.Historical Background -- 2.1.2.France -- 2.1.3.England and Wales -- 2.2.The American Tradition -- 2.2.1.Historical Development -- 2.2.2.Ethical Standards --
2.3.Asian Traditions -- 2.3.1.China -- 2.3.2.Japan -- 2.4.Islamic Traditions of the Near East -- 2.4.1.Saudi Arabia -- 2.4.2.Iran -- 2.5.Conclusions -- 3.The Historical Development of International Advocacy -- 3.1.Ancient: and Classical Arbitration -- 3.1.1.Antiquity -- 3.1.2.Middle Ages -- 3.1.3.Early Modern Age -- 3.2.The Permanent Court of Arbitration -- 3.3.The Permanent Court of International Justice -- 3.3.1.The Creation of the PCIJ -- 3.3.2.Statute -- 3.3.3.Rules of Procedure -- 3.3.4.Calls for an International Bar -- 3.4.Conclusions -- 4.The International Court of Justice -- 4.1.Historical Background -- 4.2.Admission Requirements -- 4.2.1.Agents -- 4.2.2.Membership of a National Bar -- 4.2.3.Academic Lawyers -- 4.2.4.Experts -- 4.2.5.Legal Aid -- 4.3.Ethical Standards -- 4.3.1.Duties to the Client -- 4.3.2.Duties to the Court -- 4.4.Disciplinary Jurisdiction -- 4.5.Conclusions -- 5.The European Court of Justice --
5.2.Admission Requirements -- 5.2.1.Agents -- 5.2.2.Lawyers -- 5.2.3.Employed Lawyers -- 5.2.4.Experts -- 5.3.Ethical Standards -- 5.3.1.Duties to the Client -- 5.3.2.Duties to the Court -- 5.3.3.Duties to Colleagues -- 5.4.Disciplinary Jurisdiction -- 5.5.Conclusions -- 6.The European Court of Human Rights -- 6.1.Historical Background -- 6.2.Admission Requirements -- 6.3.Ethical Standards -- 6.3.1.Duties to the Client -- 6.3.2.Duties to the Court -- 6.3.3.Duties to Colleagues -- 6.4.Disciplinary Jurisdiction -- 6.5.Conclusions -- 7.Investment Arbitration -- 7.1.Historical Background -- 7.2.Admission Requirements -- 7.3.Ethical Standards -- 7.3.1.Duties to the Client -- 7.3.2.Duties to the Tribunal -- 7.3.3.Duties to Colleagues -- 7.4.Disciplinary Jurisdiction -- 7.5.Conclusions -- 8.The International Criminal Court -- 8.1.Historical Background -- 8.1.1.Nuremberg -- 8.1.2.ICTY -- 8.2.Admission Requirements --
8.2.2.Defence Counsel -- 8.3.Ethical Standards -- 8.3.1.Prosecutors -- 8.3.2.Defence Counsel -- 8.4.Disciplinary Jurisdiction -- 8.4.1.Prosecutors -- 8.4.2.Defence Counsel -- 8.4.3.Double Deontology -- 8.5.Conclusions -- 9.Developing Common Ethical Standards before International Courts -- 9.1.Regulatory Jurisdiction of International Courts -- 9.1.1.Powers to Regulate Counsel -- 9.1.2.Practical Ability to Regulate Counsel -- 9.2.Articulation of Common Ethical Standards -- 9.2.1.ILA Hague Principles -- 9.2.2.IBA Guidelines -- 9.2.3.CCBE -- 9.3.Conclusions -- 10.Towards an International Bar -- 10.1.Centralization of Regulatory Authority -- 10.2.National Enforcement of Ethical Standards -- 10.3.International Bar Authority -- 10.3.1.Bar Admission -- 10.3.2.Code of Conduct -- 10.3.3.Standing Disciplinary Panel -- 10.4.Consequences of Professionalization -- 10.4.1.Procedural Integrity -- 10.4.2.Counsel Independence --
10.4.4.Exclusion of Non-Professionals -- 10.4.5.Formation of a Collective Bar -- 10.5.Conclusions.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Includes bibliographies and index.

Machine generated contents note: 1.The Role of Counsel Ethics in International Litigation -- 1.1.The Function of the International Judicial System -- 1.2.The Role of Professional Advocacy in International Litigation -- 1.2.1.Professionalism -- 1.2.2.Professionalization -- 1.2.3.Fundamental Ethical Duties -- 1.3.Arguments for the Professionalization of Advocacy -- 1.3.1.Solving Practical Problems -- 1.3.2.Enhancing the Image of International Courts -- 1.3.3.Stages of Professionalization -- 1.4.Arguments against the Professionalization of Advocacy -- 1.4.1.Common Ethical Standards are Impossible -- 1.4.2.Enforcement is Impracticable -- 1.4.3.Professionalization would Infringe Sovereignty -- 1.5.Conclusions -- 2.The Historical Development of National Ethical Traditions -- 2.1.European Traditions -- 2.1.1.Historical Background -- 2.1.2.France -- 2.1.3.England and Wales -- 2.2.The American Tradition -- 2.2.1.Historical Development -- 2.2.2.Ethical Standards --

Contents note continued: 2.2.3.Ethical Efficacy -- 2.3.Asian Traditions -- 2.3.1.China -- 2.3.2.Japan -- 2.4.Islamic Traditions of the Near East -- 2.4.1.Saudi Arabia -- 2.4.2.Iran -- 2.5.Conclusions -- 3.The Historical Development of International Advocacy -- 3.1.Ancient: and Classical Arbitration -- 3.1.1.Antiquity -- 3.1.2.Middle Ages -- 3.1.3.Early Modern Age -- 3.2.The Permanent Court of Arbitration -- 3.3.The Permanent Court of International Justice -- 3.3.1.The Creation of the PCIJ -- 3.3.2.Statute -- 3.3.3.Rules of Procedure -- 3.3.4.Calls for an International Bar -- 3.4.Conclusions -- 4.The International Court of Justice -- 4.1.Historical Background -- 4.2.Admission Requirements -- 4.2.1.Agents -- 4.2.2.Membership of a National Bar -- 4.2.3.Academic Lawyers -- 4.2.4.Experts -- 4.2.5.Legal Aid -- 4.3.Ethical Standards -- 4.3.1.Duties to the Client -- 4.3.2.Duties to the Court -- 4.4.Disciplinary Jurisdiction -- 4.5.Conclusions -- 5.The European Court of Justice --

Contents note continued: 5.1.Historical Background -- 5.2.Admission Requirements -- 5.2.1.Agents -- 5.2.2.Lawyers -- 5.2.3.Employed Lawyers -- 5.2.4.Experts -- 5.3.Ethical Standards -- 5.3.1.Duties to the Client -- 5.3.2.Duties to the Court -- 5.3.3.Duties to Colleagues -- 5.4.Disciplinary Jurisdiction -- 5.5.Conclusions -- 6.The European Court of Human Rights -- 6.1.Historical Background -- 6.2.Admission Requirements -- 6.3.Ethical Standards -- 6.3.1.Duties to the Client -- 6.3.2.Duties to the Court -- 6.3.3.Duties to Colleagues -- 6.4.Disciplinary Jurisdiction -- 6.5.Conclusions -- 7.Investment Arbitration -- 7.1.Historical Background -- 7.2.Admission Requirements -- 7.3.Ethical Standards -- 7.3.1.Duties to the Client -- 7.3.2.Duties to the Tribunal -- 7.3.3.Duties to Colleagues -- 7.4.Disciplinary Jurisdiction -- 7.5.Conclusions -- 8.The International Criminal Court -- 8.1.Historical Background -- 8.1.1.Nuremberg -- 8.1.2.ICTY -- 8.2.Admission Requirements --

Contents note continued: 8.2.1.Prosecutors -- 8.2.2.Defence Counsel -- 8.3.Ethical Standards -- 8.3.1.Prosecutors -- 8.3.2.Defence Counsel -- 8.4.Disciplinary Jurisdiction -- 8.4.1.Prosecutors -- 8.4.2.Defence Counsel -- 8.4.3.Double Deontology -- 8.5.Conclusions -- 9.Developing Common Ethical Standards before International Courts -- 9.1.Regulatory Jurisdiction of International Courts -- 9.1.1.Powers to Regulate Counsel -- 9.1.2.Practical Ability to Regulate Counsel -- 9.2.Articulation of Common Ethical Standards -- 9.2.1.ILA Hague Principles -- 9.2.2.IBA Guidelines -- 9.2.3.CCBE -- 9.3.Conclusions -- 10.Towards an International Bar -- 10.1.Centralization of Regulatory Authority -- 10.2.National Enforcement of Ethical Standards -- 10.3.International Bar Authority -- 10.3.1.Bar Admission -- 10.3.2.Code of Conduct -- 10.3.3.Standing Disciplinary Panel -- 10.4.Consequences of Professionalization -- 10.4.1.Procedural Integrity -- 10.4.2.Counsel Independence --

Contents note continued: 10.4.3.Party Control over Case Presentation -- 10.4.4.Exclusion of Non-Professionals -- 10.4.5.Formation of a Collective Bar -- 10.5.Conclusions.

COPYRIGHT NOT covered - Click this link to request copyright permission:

https://lib.ciu.edu/copyright-request-form

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.