Hippocratic, Religious, and Secular Medical Ethics : the Points of Conflict.
Material type: TextPublication details: Washington : Georgetown University Press, (c)2012.Description: 1 online resource (257 pages)Content type:- text
- computer
- online resource
- 9781589019478
- R724 .H577 2012
- COPYRIGHT NOT covered - Click this link to request copyright permission: https://lib.ciu.edu/copyright-request-form
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | URL | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Online Book (LOGIN USING YOUR MY CIU LOGIN AND PASSWORD) | G. Allen Fleece Library ONLINE | Non-fiction | R724 .415 2012 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Link to resource | Available | ocn819514006 |
Browsing G. Allen Fleece Library shelves, Shelving location: ONLINE, Collection: Non-fiction Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Where should physicians get their ethics? Professional codes such as the Hippocratic Oath claim moral authority for those in a particular field, yet according to medical ethicist Robert Veatch, these codes have little or nothing to do with how members of a guild should understand morality or make ethical decisions. While the Hippocratic Oath continues to be cited by a wide array of professional associations, scholars, and medical students, Veatch contends that the pledge is such an offensive code of ethics that it should be summarily excised from the profession. What, then, should serve as a born.
Includes bibliographies and index.
Introduction: the Hippocratic problem -- The Hippocratic oath and the ethic of hippocratism -- The Hippocratic tradition: a sporadic retreat -- The cacophony of codes in medical schools and professional associations -- The limits of professionally generated ethics -- Religious medical ethics: revealed and natural alternatives -- Secular ethics and professional ethics -- Fallibilism and the convergence hypothesis.
COPYRIGHT NOT covered - Click this link to request copyright permission:
There are no comments on this title.