Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Homicide justified : the legality of killing slaves in the United States and the Atlantic world / Andrew T. Fede.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Publication details: Athens, Georgia : University of Georgia Press, (c)2017.Description: 1 online resourceContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9780820351117
Subject(s): Genre/Form: LOC classification:
  • KF4545 .H665 2017
Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
Contents:
The visigoth, Spanish, Portuguese, and French laws on slave killing -- Creating a British colonial law of slave killing -- Decriminalization to amelioration on Britain's Atlantic Island colonies -- Slave killing law in Britain's Northern American colonies and the border states -- Slave killing in Britain's Southern mainland colonies -- Slave homicide reform in Virginia -- Slave homicide reform in North Carolina and the common law of slavery -- Slave homicide reform in Georgia and tennessee -- South Carolina joins the homicide law reform trend -- The antebellum states' law on slave homicide -- Conclusion : breaking out of the box of slavery law.
Subject: This comparative study looks at the laws concerning the murder of slaves by their masters and at how these laws were implemented. Andrew T. Fede cites a wide range of cases-across time, place, and circumstance-to illuminate legal, judicial, and other complexities surrounding this regrettably common occurrence. These laws had evolved to limit in different ways the masters' rights to severely punish and even kill their slaves while protecting valuable enslaved people, understood as "property," from wanton destruction by hirers, overseers, and poor whites who did not own slaves. To explore the conflicts of masters' rights with state and colonial laws, Fede shows how slave homicide law evolved and was enforced not only in the United States but also in ancient Roman, Visigoth, Spanish, Portuguese, French, and British jurisdictions. His comparative approach reveals how legal reforms regarding slave homicide in antebellum times, like past reforms dictated by emperors and kings, were the products of changing perceptions of the interests of the public; of the individual slave owners; and of the slave owners' families, heirs, and creditors. Although some slave murders came to be regarded as capital offenses, the laws con­sistently reinforced the second-class status of slaves. This influence, Fede concludes, flowed over into the application of law to free African Americans and would even make itself felt in the legal attitudes that underlay the Jim Crow era.--
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Includes bibliographies and index.

Ancient approaches to the law of homicide and slave killing -- The visigoth, Spanish, Portuguese, and French laws on slave killing -- Creating a British colonial law of slave killing -- Decriminalization to amelioration on Britain's Atlantic Island colonies -- Slave killing law in Britain's Northern American colonies and the border states -- Slave killing in Britain's Southern mainland colonies -- Slave homicide reform in Virginia -- Slave homicide reform in North Carolina and the common law of slavery -- Slave homicide reform in Georgia and tennessee -- South Carolina joins the homicide law reform trend -- The antebellum states' law on slave homicide -- Conclusion : breaking out of the box of slavery law.

This comparative study looks at the laws concerning the murder of slaves by their masters and at how these laws were implemented. Andrew T. Fede cites a wide range of cases-across time, place, and circumstance-to illuminate legal, judicial, and other complexities surrounding this regrettably common occurrence. These laws had evolved to limit in different ways the masters' rights to severely punish and even kill their slaves while protecting valuable enslaved people, understood as "property," from wanton destruction by hirers, overseers, and poor whites who did not own slaves. To explore the conflicts of masters' rights with state and colonial laws, Fede shows how slave homicide law evolved and was enforced not only in the United States but also in ancient Roman, Visigoth, Spanish, Portuguese, French, and British jurisdictions. His comparative approach reveals how legal reforms regarding slave homicide in antebellum times, like past reforms dictated by emperors and kings, were the products of changing perceptions of the interests of the public; of the individual slave owners; and of the slave owners' families, heirs, and creditors. Although some slave murders came to be regarded as capital offenses, the laws con­sistently reinforced the second-class status of slaves. This influence, Fede concludes, flowed over into the application of law to free African Americans and would even make itself felt in the legal attitudes that underlay the Jim Crow era.--

COPYRIGHT NOT covered - Click this link to request copyright permission:

https://lib.ciu.edu/copyright-request-form

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.