Analyzing design review conversations /edited by Robin S. Adams and Junaid A. Siddiqui.

Includes bibliographies and index.

Design is ubiquitous. Speaking across disciplines, it is a way of thinking that involves dealing with complex, open-ended, and contextualized problems that embody the ambiguities and contradictions in everyday life. It has become a part of pre-college education standards, is integral to how college prepares students for the future, and is playing a lead role in shaping a global innovation imperative. Efforts to advance design thinking, learning, and teaching have been the focus of the Design Thinking Research Symposium (DTRS) series. A unique feature of this series is a shared dataset in which leading design researchers globally are invited to apply their specific expertise to the dataset and bring their disciplinary interests in conversation with each other to bring together multiple facets of design thinking and catalyze new ways for teaching design thinking. Analyzing Design Review Conversations is organized around this shared dataset of conversations between those who give and those who receive feedback, guidance, or critique during a design review event. Design review conversations are a common and prevalent practice for helping designers develop design thinking expertise, although the structure and content of these reviews vary significantly. They make the design thinking of design coaches (instructors, experts, peers, and community and industry stakeholders) and design students visible. During a design review, coaches notice problematic and promising aspects of a designer's work. In this way, design students are supported in revisiting and critically evaluating their design rationales, and making sense of a design review experience in ways that allow them to construct their design thinking repertoire and evolving design identity.

Cover; Copyright; Table of Contents; Acknowledgments; Analyzing Design Review Conversations; 1. Inquiry Into Design Review Conversations; 2. Design Review Conversations: The Dataset; 3. Making Gestural frequencies; 4. Research-to-Practice Workshop: Design and Experience; Design Inquiry; 5. Robust Design Review Conversations; 6. Navigating Boundaries: Moving Between Context and Disciplinary Knowledge When Learning to Design; 7. Dimensions of Creative Evaluation: Distinct Design and Reasoning Strategies for Aesthetic, Functional, and Originality Judgments

8. Exploring the Role of Empathy in a Service-Learning Design Project9. Piecemeal Versus Integrated Framing of Design Activities; 10. Exploring the Design Cognition of Concept Design Reviews Using the FBS-Based Protocol Analysis; Design Discourse; 11. Learning From Expert/Student Dialogue to Enhance Engineering Design Education; 12. A Discursive Approach to Understanding Dependencies Between Design Acts; 13. Normative Concerns, Avoided: Instructional Barriers in Designing for Social Change; Design Interactions

14. "Wait, wait: Dan, your turn": Performing Assessment in the Group-Based Design Review15. Articulation of Professional Vision in Design Review; 16. Design Grammar-A Visual Tool for Analyzing Teacher and Student Interaction; Design Being; 17. Taking a (Design) Stance; 18. Becoming a Designer: Some Contributions of Design Reviews; 19. Multiple Means Through Which Design Identities Are Communicated During Design Reviews; Design Coaching; 20. A Quantitative Exploration of Student-Instructor Interactions Amidst Ambiguity; 21. Directing Convergent and Divergent Activity Through Design Feedback

22. Making Visible the "How" and "What" of Design Teaching23. Three Studio Critiquing Cultures: Fun Follows Function or Function Follows Fun?; Author Biographies and Contact Information; Index

COPYRIGHT NOT covered - Click this link to request copyright permission:

https://lib.ciu.edu/copyright-request-form