Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Proving Jesus' authority in Mark and John : overlooked evidence of a synoptic relationship / by Gary Greenberg.

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, (c)2018.Description: 1 online resource (vi, 234 pages) : illustrationsContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9781527523593
Subject(s): Genre/Form: LOC classification:
  • BS2615 .P768 2018
Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
Contents:
Jesus proves his authority -- Jesus declines to prove his authority -- Jesus' critics challenge the validity of his proof -- Jesus fails to prove his authority -- Conclusions.
Subject: This innovative study of the Fourth Gospel introduces important new perspectives on synoptic problems and challenges many theories about the nature of the Gospel of John's sources and composition practices. Its analysis shows that the author of John knew a written version of Mark's gospel, had strong theological objections to how Mark depicted the nature and story of Jesus and the gospel message, and composed his gospel as a theologically corrected rewriting of Mark's, using the latter's gospel as a narrative guideline for his own composition. By focusing on several seemingly different stories in Mark and John that deal with issues relating to how Jesus proved his authority, the book places each of the incidents in their narrative, sequential, and theological context, demonstrating that John knew Mark's specific stories in the same sequential order that appeared in Mark, and that John's stories represented theologically altered rewrites of the ones in Mark. The study examines the nature of John's objections to Mark, what changes John would want to make to Mark, and the formulaic editorial techniques John used to transform Mark's gospel into John's gospel. Of particular interest, it shows how John transformed Mark's stories about proof through exorcisms into Johannine stories about proof through words.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Includes bibliographies and index.

Is John's gospel a theologically corrected re-write of Mark's gospel? -- Jesus proves his authority -- Jesus declines to prove his authority -- Jesus' critics challenge the validity of his proof -- Jesus fails to prove his authority -- Conclusions.

This innovative study of the Fourth Gospel introduces important new perspectives on synoptic problems and challenges many theories about the nature of the Gospel of John's sources and composition practices. Its analysis shows that the author of John knew a written version of Mark's gospel, had strong theological objections to how Mark depicted the nature and story of Jesus and the gospel message, and composed his gospel as a theologically corrected rewriting of Mark's, using the latter's gospel as a narrative guideline for his own composition. By focusing on several seemingly different stories in Mark and John that deal with issues relating to how Jesus proved his authority, the book places each of the incidents in their narrative, sequential, and theological context, demonstrating that John knew Mark's specific stories in the same sequential order that appeared in Mark, and that John's stories represented theologically altered rewrites of the ones in Mark. The study examines the nature of John's objections to Mark, what changes John would want to make to Mark, and the formulaic editorial techniques John used to transform Mark's gospel into John's gospel. Of particular interest, it shows how John transformed Mark's stories about proof through exorcisms into Johannine stories about proof through words.

COPYRIGHT NOT covered - Click this link to request copyright permission:

https://lib.ciu.edu/copyright-request-form

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.