Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Laws of nature /John W. Carroll.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Publication details: Cambridge [England] ; New York : Cambridge University Press, (c)1994.Description: ix, 200 pages : illistrations ; 23 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 9780521433341
Subject(s): Genre/Form: LOC classification:
  • B105 .L397 1994
Available additional physical forms:
Contents:
1.1. Reduction and the wholesome base -- 1.2.Skirting empiricist influences -- 1.3. Methodology -- 1.4. Three features of laws --
2.1. Naive regularity analyses -- 2.2. Induction, laws, and lawhood -- 2.3. Simplicity, strength, and best balance -- 2.4. Epistemology and metaphysics --
3.1. The mirror argument -- 3.2. Some conceptual geography: A look at chance -- 3.3. Vacuous laws and the varieties of supervenience -- 3.4. Ethics, mind, and the laws of nature --
4.1. Lawless reality -- 4.2. Van Fraassen's antirealism -- 4.3. The argument for Humeanism --
5.1. The causal commitments of nomic dependencies -- 5.2. Lawfully equivalent epiphenomena -- 5.3. Probabilistic causation -- 5.4. Instantaneous causation -- 5.5. Causal commitments confirmed --
Appendix A: Nomic platonism -- A.1. Universals, lawhood, and reduction -- A.2. Abstract particulars, lawhood, and reduction -- A.3. Ontology and the problem of laws -- Appendix B: Defending (South Carolina) -- B.1. Direct challenges -- B.2. An indirect challenge.
Subject: John W. Carroll undertakes a careful philosophical examination of laws of nature, causation, and other related topics. He argues that laws of nature are not susceptible to the sort of philosophical treatment preferred by empiricists. Indeed, he shows that empirically pure matters of fact need not even determine what the laws are. Similar, and even stronger, conclusions are drawn about causation. Replacing the traditional view of laws and causation as requiring some kind of foundational legitimacy, the author argues that these phenomena are inextricably intertwined with everything else. This distinctively clear and detailed discussion of what it is to be a law will be valuable to a broad swathe of philosophers in metaphysics, epistemology, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of science.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Withdrawn G. Allen Fleece Library WITHDRAWN Non-fiction B105.C319.L397 1994 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 31923001670278

CHAPTER 1 - Centrality. -- 1.1. Reduction and the wholesome base -- 1.2.Skirting empiricist influences -- 1.3. Methodology -- 1.4. Three features of laws --

CHAPTER 2 - Humean analyses. -- 2.1. Naive regularity analyses -- 2.2. Induction, laws, and lawhood -- 2.3. Simplicity, strength, and best balance -- 2.4. Epistemology and metaphysics --

CHAPTER 3 - Humean supervenience -- 3.1. The mirror argument -- 3.2. Some conceptual geography: A look at chance -- 3.3. Vacuous laws and the varieties of supervenience -- 3.4. Ethics, mind, and the laws of nature --

CHAPTER 4 - A realist perspective -- 4.1. Lawless reality -- 4.2. Van Fraassen's antirealism -- 4.3. The argument for Humeanism --

CHAPTER 5 - Causation -- 5.1. The causal commitments of nomic dependencies -- 5.2. Lawfully equivalent epiphenomena -- 5.3. Probabilistic causation -- 5.4. Instantaneous causation -- 5.5. Causal commitments confirmed --

CHAPTER 6 - The limits of inquiry --

APPENDICES. -- Appendix A: Nomic platonism -- A.1. Universals, lawhood, and reduction -- A.2. Abstract particulars, lawhood, and reduction -- A.3. Ontology and the problem of laws -- Appendix B: Defending (South Carolina) -- B.1. Direct challenges -- B.2. An indirect challenge.

John W. Carroll undertakes a careful philosophical examination of laws of nature, causation, and other related topics. He argues that laws of nature are not susceptible to the sort of philosophical treatment preferred by empiricists. Indeed, he shows that empirically pure matters of fact need not even determine what the laws are. Similar, and even stronger, conclusions are drawn about causation. Replacing the traditional view of laws and causation as requiring some kind of foundational legitimacy, the author argues that these phenomena are inextricably intertwined with everything else. This distinctively clear and detailed discussion of what it is to be a law will be valuable to a broad swathe of philosophers in metaphysics, epistemology, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of science.

COPYRIGHT NOT covered - Click this link to request copyright permission:

https://lib.ciu.edu/copyright-request-form

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.