Animal rights : opposing viewpoints / Andrew Harnack, book editor. [print]

Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextPublication details: San Diego, California : Greenhaven Press, (c)1996.Description: 240 pages : illustrations ; 23 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • HV4711.H289.A556 1996
Available additional physical forms:
  • COPYRIGHT NOT covered - Click this link to request copyright permission:
Contents:
All animals are equal Peter Singer -- All animals are not equal R.G. Frey -- The case for strong animal rights Tom Regan -- The case for weak animal rights Mary Anne Warren -- Christianity supports animal rights Annecy Report to the World Council of Churches -- Christianity does not support animal rights James Parker -- Animal experimentation is justified American Medical Association -- Animal experimentation is not justified Michael Allen Fox -- The case for animal research in psychology Elizabeth Baldwin -- The case against animal research in psychology Bernard E. Rollin -- The case for dissection Susan Offner -- The case against dissection F. Barbara Orlans -- Primate research is justified Alfred M. Prince -- Primate research is not justified Geza Teleki -- Modern farming is humane Steve Kopperud -- Modern farming is inhumane Laura Ten Eyck -- The case for vegetarianism People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals -- The case for eating meat Daryn Eller -- Farm animals should be genetically engineered Tabitha Powledge -- Farm animals should not be genetically engineered Raymond Giraud -- Hunting animals is morally acceptable Ryland Loos -- Hunting animals is morally objectionable Matt Cartmill -- Zoos help preserve endangered species Colin Tudge -- Zoos do not help preserve endangered species Eileen Murphy -- The animal rights movement must reject animal welfarism Tom Regan and Gary Francione -- The animal rights movement must embrace animal welfarism Ingrid Newkirk -- The animal rights movement must learn to compromise Peter Wilson -- The animal rights movement must be politically pragmatic Kim Stallwood.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

All animals are equal Peter Singer -- All animals are not equal R.G. Frey -- The case for strong animal rights Tom Regan -- The case for weak animal rights Mary Anne Warren -- Christianity supports animal rights Annecy Report to the World Council of Churches -- Christianity does not support animal rights James Parker -- Animal experimentation is justified American Medical Association -- Animal experimentation is not justified Michael Allen Fox -- The case for animal research in psychology Elizabeth Baldwin -- The case against animal research in psychology Bernard E. Rollin -- The case for dissection Susan Offner -- The case against dissection F. Barbara Orlans -- Primate research is justified Alfred M. Prince -- Primate research is not justified Geza Teleki -- Modern farming is humane Steve Kopperud -- Modern farming is inhumane Laura Ten Eyck -- The case for vegetarianism People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals -- The case for eating meat Daryn Eller -- Farm animals should be genetically engineered Tabitha Powledge -- Farm animals should not be genetically engineered Raymond Giraud -- Hunting animals is morally acceptable Ryland Loos -- Hunting animals is morally objectionable Matt Cartmill -- Zoos help preserve endangered species Colin Tudge -- Zoos do not help preserve endangered species Eileen Murphy -- The animal rights movement must reject animal welfarism Tom Regan and Gary Francione -- The animal rights movement must embrace animal welfarism Ingrid Newkirk -- The animal rights movement must learn to compromise Peter Wilson -- The animal rights movement must be politically pragmatic Kim Stallwood.

COPYRIGHT NOT covered - Click this link to request copyright permission:

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.