Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Lost causes : agenda vetting in global issue networks and the shaping of human security / Charli Carpenter.

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: Ithaca ; London : Cornell University Press, (c)2014.Description: 1 online resourceContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9780801470363
Subject(s): Genre/Form: LOC classification:
  • JC571 .L678 2014
Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
Contents:
Networks, centrality and issue creation in global politics -- A network theory of advocacy gate-keeper decision-making -- You harm, you help: pitching collateral damage control to humanitarian gatekeepers -- From Stop the robot wars! to Ban killer robots!: pitching autonomous weapons to disarmament gatekeepers -- His body, his choice: pitching infant male circumcision to human rights gatekeepers -- Conclusion -- Appendix: studying transnational spaces: a multi-method approach -- Notes -- References -- Index.
Subject: Why do some issues and threats-diseases, weapons, human rights abuses, vulnerable populations-get more global policy attention than others? How do global activist networks decide the particular causes for which they advocate among the many problems in need of solutions? According to Charli Carpenter, the answer lies in the politics of global issue networks themselves. Building on surveys, focus groups, and analyses of issue network websites, Carpenter concludes that network access has a direct relation to influence over how issues are ranked. Advocacy elites in nongovernmental and transnational organizations judge candidate issues not just on their merit but on how the issues connect to specific organizations, individuals, and even other issues. In "Lost" Causes, Carpenter uses three case studies of emerging campaigns to show these dynamics at work: banning infant male circumcision; compensating the wartime killing and maiming of civilians; and prohibiting the deployment of fully autonomous weapons (so-called killer robots). The fate of each of these campaigns was determined not just by the persistence and hard work of entrepreneurs but by advocacy elites' perception of the issues' network ties. Combining sweeping analytical argument with compelling narrative, Carpenter reveals how the global human security agenda is determined.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Includes bibliographies and index.

Agenda-vetting in global politics -- Networks, centrality and issue creation in global politics -- A network theory of advocacy gate-keeper decision-making -- You harm, you help: pitching collateral damage control to humanitarian gatekeepers -- From Stop the robot wars! to Ban killer robots!: pitching autonomous weapons to disarmament gatekeepers -- His body, his choice: pitching infant male circumcision to human rights gatekeepers -- Conclusion -- Appendix: studying transnational spaces: a multi-method approach -- Notes -- References -- Index.

Why do some issues and threats-diseases, weapons, human rights abuses, vulnerable populations-get more global policy attention than others? How do global activist networks decide the particular causes for which they advocate among the many problems in need of solutions? According to Charli Carpenter, the answer lies in the politics of global issue networks themselves. Building on surveys, focus groups, and analyses of issue network websites, Carpenter concludes that network access has a direct relation to influence over how issues are ranked. Advocacy elites in nongovernmental and transnational organizations judge candidate issues not just on their merit but on how the issues connect to specific organizations, individuals, and even other issues. In "Lost" Causes, Carpenter uses three case studies of emerging campaigns to show these dynamics at work: banning infant male circumcision; compensating the wartime killing and maiming of civilians; and prohibiting the deployment of fully autonomous weapons (so-called killer robots). The fate of each of these campaigns was determined not just by the persistence and hard work of entrepreneurs but by advocacy elites' perception of the issues' network ties. Combining sweeping analytical argument with compelling narrative, Carpenter reveals how the global human security agenda is determined.

COPYRIGHT NOT covered - Click this link to request copyright permission:

https://lib.ciu.edu/copyright-request-form

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.