Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Race on the brain : what implicit bias gets wrong about the struggle for racial justice / Jonathan Kahn.

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: New York : Columbia University Press, (c)2018.Description: 1 online resource (291 pages)Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9780231545389
Subject(s): Genre/Form: LOC classification:
  • HV9950 .R334 2018
Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
Contents:
Defining and measuring implicit bias -- The uptake of implicit social cognition by the legal academy -- Accepting conservative frames: time, color-blindness, diversity, and intent -- Behavioral realism in action -- Deracinating the legal subject -- Obscuring power -- Recreational antiracism and the power of positive nudging -- Seeking a technical fix to racism -- Biologizing racism: the ultimate technical fix -- Conclusion: contesting the common sense of racism.
Subject: Of the many obstacles to racial justice in America, none has received more recent attention than the one that lurks in our subconscious. As social movements and policing scandals have shown how far from being "postracial" we are, the concept of implicit bias has taken center stage in national conversation about race. Millions of Americans have taken online tests purporting to show the deep, invisible roots of their prejudice. When a recent Oxford study claimed to have found a drug that reduced implicit bias, it was only the starkest example of a pervasive trend. But what do we risk when we seek the simplicity of a technological diagnosis-and solution-for racism? What do we miss when we locate racism in our biology and our brains rather than in our history and our social practices? In Race on the Brain, Jonathan Kahn argues that implicit bias has grown into a master narrative of race relations-one with profound if unintended negative consequences for law, science, and society. He emphasizes its limitations, arguing that while useful as a tool to understand particular types of behavior, it is only one among the various tools available to policymakers. An uncritical embrace of implicit bias, to the exclusion of power relations and structural racism, undermines civic responsibility for addressing the problem by turning it over to experts. Technological interventions, including many tests for implicit bias, are premised on a color-blind ideal and run the risk of erasing history, denying present reality, and obscuring accountability
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number URL Status Date due Barcode
Online Book (LOGIN USING YOUR MY CIU LOGIN AND PASSWORD) Online Book (LOGIN USING YOUR MY CIU LOGIN AND PASSWORD) G. Allen Fleece Library ONLINE Non-fiction HV9950 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Link to resource Available on1011630548

Includes bibliographies and index.

Introduction: rethinking implicit bias: the limits to science as a tool of racial justice -- Defining and measuring implicit bias -- The uptake of implicit social cognition by the legal academy -- Accepting conservative frames: time, color-blindness, diversity, and intent -- Behavioral realism in action -- Deracinating the legal subject -- Obscuring power -- Recreational antiracism and the power of positive nudging -- Seeking a technical fix to racism -- Biologizing racism: the ultimate technical fix -- Conclusion: contesting the common sense of racism.

Of the many obstacles to racial justice in America, none has received more recent attention than the one that lurks in our subconscious. As social movements and policing scandals have shown how far from being "postracial" we are, the concept of implicit bias has taken center stage in national conversation about race. Millions of Americans have taken online tests purporting to show the deep, invisible roots of their prejudice. When a recent Oxford study claimed to have found a drug that reduced implicit bias, it was only the starkest example of a pervasive trend. But what do we risk when we seek the simplicity of a technological diagnosis-and solution-for racism? What do we miss when we locate racism in our biology and our brains rather than in our history and our social practices? In Race on the Brain, Jonathan Kahn argues that implicit bias has grown into a master narrative of race relations-one with profound if unintended negative consequences for law, science, and society. He emphasizes its limitations, arguing that while useful as a tool to understand particular types of behavior, it is only one among the various tools available to policymakers. An uncritical embrace of implicit bias, to the exclusion of power relations and structural racism, undermines civic responsibility for addressing the problem by turning it over to experts. Technological interventions, including many tests for implicit bias, are premised on a color-blind ideal and run the risk of erasing history, denying present reality, and obscuring accountability

COPYRIGHT NOT covered - Click this link to request copyright permission:

https://lib.ciu.edu/copyright-request-form

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.